Tag

featured

Browsing

JERUSALEMAmid allegations leveled against the Biden administration that it is placating the Islamic Republic of Iran’s drive to build a nuclear weapon, former Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Tehran seeks a nuclear Holocaust targeting the Jewish state.

Lieberman, a member of Israel’s parliament (Knesset), told Israel’s Army Radio Tuesday Iran is ‘planning a Holocaust for us in the next two years.’

‘We are in the midst of an Iranian extermination program,’ Lieberman said. ‘Israel will be attacked with the aim of destroying it from several fronts with tens of thousands of missiles at the same time.’

A day after Lieberman’s comments, Israeli Brig. Gen (Res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, the former head of the research division in the Israel Defense Force’s Military Intelligence, told the Israeli TPS news agency, ‘The Biden administration wants to avoid any confrontation with Iran. They are afraid that if they move into confrontation, confrontational Iran may actually move towards having a bomb. But maybe [Iran’s leaders] believe that Trump is going to become the next president. They might actually try to break out a bomb now.’

Kuperwasser continued, ‘They have enough material to produce the fissile material that is necessary for three bombs within a month.’

This week saw a flurry of regulatory, diplomatic and congressional activity directed at Iran for its continued work on its illicit atomic weapons program. 

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censured Iran Wednesday for its lack of cooperation with agency inspectors. Britain, France and Germany initiated the resolution. The Wall Street Journal reported the Biden administration sought to dissuade the Europeans from rebuking Iran at the IAEA. 

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller denied the Wall Street Journal report, noting the ‘report is not true. We have not lobbied any country to vote against or abstain from any resolution in that regard. We are actively increasing pressure on Iran through a combination of sanctions, deterrence and international isolation to counter their destabilizing behavior and prevent them from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

‘But I think you should not expect us to be acting in any sort of disharmony with our E3 partners. We’ve prized our unity with them, and I expect that to continue.’ 

After mounting pressure on the U.S. to join the Europeans in a reprimand of Iran, the U.S. agreed at the 11th hour Wednesday.

Fox News Digital had asked the U.S. State Department for its response to Lieberman’s prediction about Iran’s use of nuclear weapons, the numerous diplomatic sources who said the EU did not want to rebuke Iran at the IAEA and whether the Biden administration plans to impose new sanctions on Tehran.

The British, French and German governments on Friday sent a letter to the United Nations Security Council outlining Iran’s alleged violations of the 2015 nuclear deal. However, the European countries did not announce a ‘snap back’ of U.N. sanctions on Iran for its alleged violations of the accord. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the formal name for the Iran nuclear deal, expires Oct. 18, 2025. 

The Trump administration withdrew from the deal in 2018 because, the former president argued, it was a ‘horrible’ deal that only placed temporary restrictions on Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapons arsenal.

According to Iran International, Ali Shamkhani, a senior aide to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, is now overseeing the nuclear talks for the Islamic Republic. Shamkhani issued a defiant post Thursday, stating, ‘From the JCPOA until the recent IAEA BoGs meeting, in compliance with their roles as good & bad police, the #US & the #EuropeanTroika have been trying to manage Iran’s reactions to their misbehavior by creating false hope in Iran. They have never been successful & never will be.’ 

Fox News Digital reported this week that Republican Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., submitted a resolution that would ‘refer the issue to the U.N. Security Council and reaffirm that all measures will be taken to prevent the regime in Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.’

In late May, Fox News Digital reported that an IAEA document obtained by The Associated Press said that as of May 11, Iran had 313.2 pounds of uranium enriched up to 60%, an increase of 45.4 pounds since the last report by the U.N. watchdog in February. Uranium enriched at 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.

Fox News’ Jamie Joseph and Pilar Arias contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A former top intelligence official gave a one-word answer when asked if he would retract the letter he signed along with 51 other former officials warning Hunter Biden’s infamous ‘laptop from hell’ was Russian disinformation.

James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence in the Obama administration, signed the heavily scrutinized letter just weeks before the 2020 presidential election, claiming the laptop had ‘all the earmarks’ of a Russian effort to influence the vote.

‘No,’ he simply said when asked by Fox News Digital if he regretted signing it despite the laptop now being used by prosecutors arguing Hunter committed a federal gun crime.

Clapper also refused to publicly remove his name from the letter despite evidence proving the device and its contents were legitimate and would not concede he and the other former intelligence officials who signed on should have waited longer to weigh in.

The laptop, filled with videos and photos of drug use, sex acts and sensitive business communications, was shown to the jury Tuesday in an effort to prove the president’s son lied about using drugs on a gun purchase form. 

Critics took to social media to blast Clapper and others following revelations the laptop would be entered into evidence.

‘No one is above the law, except: James Clapper — lied to Congress/never charged,political science professor Nicholas Giordano wrote in a post on X. That was a reference to Clapper previously being accused of perjury when he testified before Congress that the Obama administration was ‘not wittingly’ collecting Americans’ telephone records.

‘It was an intelligence community coup,’ wrote another X user, suggesting the letter’s timing was meant to influence the 2020 election.

While the laptop has since been authenticated by a variety of news outlets, it was rejected when the New York Post first reported it in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election, including by Joe Biden’s campaign, which vigorously denied its legitimacy. 

The campaign, however, appeared to be coordinating the release of the letter signed by Clapper, which was published days before a debate between Biden and Trump in which Biden claimed, ‘There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s accusing me of is a Russian plant.’

Despite claims from former officials that the laptop had the hallmarks of Russian disinformation, Fox News Digital reported that federal investigators with the Department of Justice knew in December 2019 that Hunter Biden’s laptop was ‘not manipulated in any way’ and contained ‘reliable evidence.’ 

But they were ‘obstructed’ from seeing all available information, according to an IRS whistleblower involved in the probe, nearly a year before the former intelligence officials and Joe Biden declared it was part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

Fox News’ Brian Flood and Brooke Singman contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A clip of liberal comedian Chelsea Handler saying that 50 Cent ‘cannot vote’ for former President Donald Trump during 2020 because he is Black sparked a snarky response from Sen. Tim Scott this week.

Sen. Scott, R-S.C, hit back at Handler in a social media post on Friday, saying, ‘tell another Black man how to think.’

‘Yes, by all means, please tell another Black man how to think, White lady,’ Scott wrote.

The comedian made the comments about the rapper, 50 Cent, who she briefly dated in 2011, during a remote interview with Jimmy Fallon on the Tonight Show in 2020.

‘And I had to remind him that he was a Black person, so he can’t vote for Donald Trump,’ she told Fallon. 

The comedian argued that the rapper had a responsibility to not influence people to vote for Trump in 2020.

‘He shouldn’t be influencing an entire swathe of people who may listen to him, because he’s worried about his own personal pocketbook,’ she said. 

Scott previously pushed against the narrative that Black people should vote for Democrats, recently calling out ‘The View’ after they mocked him for his leadership in bringing Black voters over to the Republican Party.

‘Women of ‘The View’: My goodness gracious. Let me just be plain and simple. Without the Black vote, there is no Democratic Party,’ Scott told ‘Hannity.’ ‘And since I was elected in 2010 to Congress, before that, no Black Republicans [in Congress]. But since then, there’s been seven.’ 

Scott said, ‘President Trump’s policies have led to a surge’ of Black Republican political candidates taking office at the ‘city level, to the county level, to the state level, and in Congress.’ 

‘We’re seeing Black city council members, we’re seeing Black assembly members all across this nation,’ he said. ‘There is a wave of Black elected officials who happen to be Republicans. But the Black vote is following.’ 

‘The View’ co-host Sunny Hostin had said Friday that Scott was not making a strong case for Black conservatives. Scott got under Hostin’s skin last year when he rejected her beliefs on the show about systemic racism.

‘Just to speak for African-American voters,’ Hostin said. ‘If anyone thinks that Tim Scott is going to bring over a bunch of Black men, they need to just get with it, because Tim Scott is the only African-American senator in the Republican Party for a reason.’ 

Scott is one of several candidates that former President Trump is reportedly considering as his running mate in the 2024 election. 

Scott ran for the Republican nomination but dropped out before the Iowa caucuses and went on to endorse Trump.

Fox News’ Jeffrey Clark contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Islamic Republic of Iran’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) to crack down on its populace is having a particular impact on the freedoms of Iranian women. 

Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital the Iranian regime ‘is moving into the AI realm to benefit even more from technology that links together the disparate elements of facial recognition, CCTV, cell phone analysis, traffic geolocation and internet monitoring,’ which ‘bolster its cyber crackdown on street protesters or women who don’t wear their hijab correctly.’

Enhanced AI tools will be a key facet of the forthcoming Hijab and Chastity Bill, approved by the Iranian Parliament in September 2023 and awaiting ratification from the regime’s Guardian Council. 

Taleblu said AI has become ‘the cherry on the sundae of Iran’s digital repression, whether that starts with very crude tools like CCTV in a shop or whatever repository of purportedly criminal behavior that the regime puts at the feet of these AI sorting tools. Because humans don’t have to make the linkages, it frees up more manpower for mischief from the Iranian repressive apparatus.’

Article 30 of the Hijab and Chastity Bill states police will ‘create and strengthen intelligent systems for identifying perpetrators of illegal behavior using tools such as fixed and mobile cameras,’ Iran International reported. Article 60 forces private businesses to turn in video footage to enforcement personnel to check for compliance. 

Businesses that fail to comply could lose ‘two to six months worth of profits.’ Women who fail to cover their hair properly face consequences ranging from fines to ‘social exclusion, exile, closure of social media pages, passport confiscation for up to two years’ and possibly imprisonment for up to 10 years. 

Taleblu explained the Hijab and Chastity Bill allows authorities to use AI to leverage ‘lawfare and economic warfare against women’ by going after non-compliant women’s homes, cars, bank accounts and livelihoods. 

U.N. experts say the bill allows Iran to govern ‘through systemic discrimination with the intention of suppressing women and girls into total submission,’ which amounts to gender persecution, or gender apartheid. 

Long before the bill’s passage, the regime began preparing for increased AI use, installing new cameras throughout Iran as early as April 2023. A report from Amnesty International detailed increasing pressures on Iranian women between April 15, 2023, and June 14, 2023. During this period, an Iranian police spokesperson claimed police had sent ‘almost 1 million SMS warning messages to women captured unveiled in their cars’ and 133,174 messages about vehicle immobilizations. About 2,000 cars had been confiscated, and more than 4,000 ‘repeat offenders’ had been referred to Iran’s judiciary.

Between April 2023 and March 2024, Amnesty International found the morality police had ‘ordered the arbitrary confiscation of hundreds of thousands of vehicles’ because those inside were improperly covered. Testimony indicates confiscation orders were ‘based on pictures captured by surveillance cameras or reports from plainclothes agents patrolling the streets and using a police app … to report license plates.’ Amnesty also reported that some women were sentenced to prison or flogging, faced fines or were sent to ‘morality’ classes.

The regime likely used AI during 2022 protests after the death of Mahsa Amini, who was beaten after being arrested by morality police for wearing her hijab too loosely.

As head of the United Nations’ fact-finding mission into Iran’s 2022 protests, Sara Hossain determined the Iranian regime did use AI to monitor social media platforms during protests, Iran Wire reported. 

In October 2023, the U.S. sped up its timeline for blocking exports of AI chips to China, Iran and Russia to curtail their access to advanced AI capabilities.

Taleblu suggested additional methods for controlling access to tech that could ‘bolster Iran’s digital or cyber repressive apparatus.’ He recommends the U.S. work with European firms to increase export controls and keep close track of new Chinese tech subsidiaries operating in Iran. By consistently exposing and sanctioning new firms, the U.S. ‘increases their transaction costs.’

‘There is talk of tech and cyberspace and AI freeing people and building bridges,’ Taleblu said, ‘but the Islamic Republic is really intending to use them to build boundaries and then continue to wall off Iran and impose their will on the population.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The judge presiding over former President Trump’s New York criminal trial notified his defense team on Friday of a comment on the court’s public Facebook page that implies one of the jurors discussed the guilty verdict with family before the trial concluded.

Fox News obtained the letter Judge Juan Merchan shared with Trump defense attorneys and Manhattan prosecutors. 

”Today, the Court became aware of a comment that was posted on the Unified Court System’s public Facebook page and which I now bring to your attention. In the comment, the user, ‘Michael Anderson,’ states:

‘’My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted! Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!’’

The comment was posted on May 29 ‘regarding oral arguments in the Fourth Department of the Appellate Division unrelated to this proceeding.’ 

The profile for ‘Michael Anderson’ has little publicly available information, but the user identifies himself as a ‘Transabled & professional sh– poster.’

A Trump campaign official told Fox News Digital they are ‘investigating the matter.’ 

Al Baker, state OCA spokesperson, said Friday that ‘as appropriate, the Court informed the parties once it learned of this online content.’

The post came a day before Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. Trump had pleaded not guilty to all charges. 

The six-week-long trial stemmed from charges brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

By the end of 2024, Paul Whelan will mark six years in Russian Prison. One month before that, is the November Presidential Election. Experts familiar with the negotiations say, there could be a window of opportunity to free Whelan, shortly after the election.

‘I think the door will open again to do the negotiations,’ said Mickey Bergman, Vice President of the Richardson Center for Global Engagement. ‘I just wish we didn’t have to wait, because for us, it’s a few more months. For the prisoners, every day is a day that they might die.’

Bergman has worked on negotiations to free Americans held overseas for the last decade, including those in Russia. He worked alongside former Ambassador to the UN and former democratic New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. Bergman now directs Global Reach for the Richardson Center for Global Engagement. He believes recent arrests of U.S. citizens could be a response to failed efforts to release Paul Whelan.

‘The case of Russia is fascinating. They took Paul Whelan, they wanted to do a certain deal. We refused to negotiate, so they took Trevor Reed. We still refused to negotiate, they took Brittney Griner,’ Bergman said.

Whelan was arrested in December 2018. He was visiting Russia for a friend’s wedding when he suddenly disappeared. Three days later, Russia’s government announced his arrest on espionage charges.

‘We’ve made clear to the Russians our expectation that we will learn more about the charges, come to understand what it is he’s been accused of and if the detention is not appropriate we will demand his immediate return,’ Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said at the time.

Whelan was a corporate security executive and former Marine. He was given a bad conduct discharge in 2008 after he was convicted on charges that include using fake documents and attempting to steal thousands of dollars while on duty in Iraq. He had been visiting Russia since at least 2007 and had spent more than a decade cultivating friends and contacts in the country. His family insisted Whelan was in Russia for tourism when he was arrested.

‘My brother is not a spy,’ Whelan’s brother David said shortly after his arrest. ‘Paul’s background is in law enforcement. He has military experience, he’s in corporate security.’

Experts believe his arrest was the Kremlin’s response to the U.S. imprisonment of a Russian citizen. Maria Butina pleaded guilty in 2018 to a U.S. federal charge of conspiracy to act as a foreign agent. Butina had provided information to Russia’s government on key U.S. political figures.

‘My reputation is ruined, both here in the United States and abroad,’ Butina told a federal judge before she was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

There were some discussions that Butina could be swapped for Whelan but that effort never gained momentum.

‘At the current stage, there is no talk about any sort of exchange,’ Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in January 2019.

Butina was released in 2019, after serving most of her sentence. She now serves in Russia’s parliament, the State Duma. She was sanctioned in 2022 by the U.S. Treasury over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. By then, Whelan had served two years of his 16-year prison sentence.

‘There were four opportunities to bring him home, and that didn’t happen,’ Bergman said.

Negotiators first began working on a prisoner swap including Russian Drug Smuggler Konstantin Yaroshenko. Bergman details the negotiations in his new book, In the Shadows, where the Russians requested dental care for Yaroshenko, in exchange for medical care for Whelan.

‘We started with baby steps,’ Bergman said about negotiations with Russian Ambassador Anatoly Antonov. ‘He said, ‘basically, it’s not tit for tat, but we believe in reciprocity. If you can arrange Konstantin Yaroshenko for dental care, I’m sure that Paul Whelan will get his medical exam that you’re asking for.’’

When the COVID-19 pandemic escalated, Bergman and his team worked with Russian negotiators to advance the reciprocity discussions.

‘Antonov, without actually saying it… suggested that if we’re able to secure the release of Konstantin Yaroshenko on humanitarian ground, they will reciprocate and Paul Whelan will return home,’ Bergman said.

Bergman took the offer to the White House, believing the offer was a good one, but the Trump Administration turned down the deal.

‘It’s complicated. I believe Donald Trump really wanted to bring Paul Whelan home, as he still does. He talks about him and the rest of the Americans that are being held, but he didn’t want to give anything in return,’ Bergman said.

Around two years later Yaroshenko’s name would be on the negotiating table once again, in exchange for a different U.S. prisoner.

‘When we do our work, none of the deals that we bring together are fair or just, and they get criticized a lot,’ Bergman said.

Trevor Reed was arrested in 2019, after he was accused of assaulting a Russian police officer. Bergman says Russia requested a two-for-two prisoner swap. Whelan and Reed would head back to the U.S. in exchange for Yaroshenko and a Russian arms dealer, known as the Merchant of Death, Viktor Bout. The U.S. was hesitant to make a deal including Bout, who had been convicted by a U.S. federal grand jury in 2011 of conspiracy to kill U.S. citizens.

‘We have to take into account that our counterparts in Russia might be playing us as well,’ Bergman said.

As President Biden prepared to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin for the 2021 Helsinki summit, Bergman and Richardson suggested the White House bring up a possible prisoner swap.

‘I said the families of the detained Americans came up and we discussed it,’ President Biden said following the meeting. ‘I am not going to walk away on that issue.’

Bergman says no official proposals were ever put forward after the summit. Only half of the deal would be executed nearly a year later. Reed returned to the U.S. and Yaroshenko was sent back to Russia. He now serves as part of Putin’s Prison Oversight Chamber.

‘When we went to negotiate over Trevor Reed and Paul Whelan, it was end of February and the beginning of the war in Ukraine,’ Bergman said. ‘We actually didn’t know that Brittney Griner was already taken.’

Just days before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Phoenix Mercury player Brittney Griner was traveling to Russia to play for the country’s premier league during the WNBA off-season. As she was going through customs, officials found cannabis oil in her luggage. She was arrested on smuggling charges for carrying the substance, which is illegal in Russia.

‘We are not arguing that Brittney took it here as a medicine. We are still saying that she involuntarily brought it here because she was in a rush,’ Griner attorney Alexander Boykov said after a court hearing in July 2022.

Negotiators would discuss another two-for-two swap including Griner and Whelan in exchange for Bout and a Russian Money launderer. U.S. officials say the Russians decided against releasing Whelan. Griner would be freed in exchange for Bout.

‘This was not a choice of which American to bring home. Sadly, for totally illegitimate reasons, Russia is treating Paul’s case differently than Brittney’s,’ President Joe Biden said in December 2022 after Griner’s release.

Bout returned to Russia and now serves as a member of a regional legislature. He maintains his U.S. imprisonment, like Griner’s in Russia, was unjust.

‘The same outrage was in Russia when I was sentenced to 25 years. Many people would say ‘for what?” Bout told ESPN in September 2023.

Wall Street Journal Reporter Evan Gershkovich was arrested nearly four months after Griner’s release. He was detained while on a reporting trip to the Ural Mountains and is accused of spying.

‘The Russians are very, very specific. Evan Gershkovich is a reporter. There’s another reporter from Radio Free Europe, also, who has been picked up and is being held in Russia.’

Prague-based editor Alsu Kurmasheva was arrested in October of 2023 after she traveled to see her elderly mother. She faces multiple charges including not self-reporting as a foreign agent.

‘The Russians don’t view them as political prisoners. They view them as something else,’ Bergman said.

The cases of Gershkovich and Whelan have received the most coverage, but an unknown number of Americans are detained in Russian prisons.

Less-known cases include American school teacher Marc Fogel and musician Travis Leake, who were arrested separately on drug charges. Ksenia Khavana is a dual national and was arrested on treason charges when she returned to Russia to visit her family.

Last month, U.S. Army soldier Gordon Black was arrested on charges of criminal misconduct, after a woman reported a complaint. A Russian court says he will be detained until at least July 2.

Bergman says Putin likely won’t make a deal to release any of the detainees, until after the U.S. election.

‘President Putin doesn’t have any interest in making a deal that might make President Biden look good,’ Bergman said. ‘You might call me an optimist, but I believe that after November, no matter what the election results are in this country, there will be a period of opportunity to negotiate.’

While the U.S. and others can work with negotiators to call for the release of Americans overseas, the government cannot state to an overseas court that a citizen is guilty or innocent. U.S. Government officials also cannot provide legal advice or representation. The State Department currently has Russia at a level 4 travel advisory and urges Americans not to go there, partly due to the singling out of U.S. citizens for detention.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has acknowledged previously unreported trips overseas that were paid for by his friend, conservative businessman Harlan Crow. 

One of the 2019 trips was to Bali, where the justice was accompanied by his wife, Virginia. Another trip paid for by the Crows was to Sonoma County, California.

Thomas on Friday released his amended 2023 financial disclosure forms — required of all federal judges — to include those earlier trips. The travel was not disclosed in the 2019 report.

‘During the preparation and filing of this report, filer sought and received guidance from his accountant and ethics counsel,’ the filing states.

‘Consistent with the review of prior filings that the filer began last year, report for calendar year 2019 is hereby amended to include the following entries under the reimbursement section, which was inadvertently omitted at the time of filing:

Source: Harlan & Kathy Crow Dates: July 12, 2019: Location: Bali, Indonesia Purpose: Guests of Source Items Paid or Provided: Food and Lodging at HotelSource: Harlan Crow Dates: July 18-21, 2019: Location: Monte Rio, CA Purpose: Guest of Source Items Paid or Provided: Food and Lodging at Private Club.’

Thomas’ vacations were first documented in April 2023. Thomas issued a rare statement at the time defending the trips and explaining that he had always followed Supreme Court guidance.

‘Harlan and Kathy Crow are among our dearest friends, and we have been friends for over twenty-five years,’ the justice, who has served on the bench for 32 years, said in a statement at the time.

‘As friends do, we have joined them on a number of family trips during the more than quarter century we have known them. Early in my tenure at the Court, I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the Court, was not reportable,’ Thomas said.

‘I have endeavored to follow that counsel throughout my tenure, and have always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines,’ he said. ‘These guidelines are now being changed, as the committee of the Judicial Conference responsible for financial disclosure for the entire federal judiciary just this past month announced new guidance. And, it is, of course, my intent to follow this guidance in the future.’

Financial reports for seven other justices were released Friday. Only Samuel Alito did not release one but was given a 90-day extension.

In November, the Supreme Court issued a new ‘Code of Conduct’ following months of heightened scrutiny from Senate Judiciary Democrats pushing for new ethics laws for the high court. 

The Code is a set of five ‘canons,’ including two new canons that appear to be in response to reports over travel arrangements for private trips taken by Justices Thomas and Samuel Alito paid by others, and use of court staff for book promotion — referring to a recent report that staff of Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s staff urged colleges and libraries to buy her latest book. 

‘A Justice should not to any substantial degree use judicial chambers, resources, or staff to engage in activities that do not materially support official functions or other activities permitted under these Canons,’ the code states. 

‘A Justice may accept reasonable compensation and reimbursement of expenses for permitted activities if the source of the payments does not give the appearance of influencing the Justice’s official duties or otherwise appear improper,’ the rules say.

‘Expense reimbursement should be limited to the actual or reasonably estimated costs of travel, food, and lodging reasonably incurred by the Justice and, where appropriate to the occasion, by the Justice’s spouse or relative,’ the new code says.

The Code also states, ‘For some time, all Justices have agreed to comply with the statute governing financial disclosure, and the undersigned Members of the Court each individually reaffirm that commitment.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

British Prime Minister Rish Sunak apologized Friday after he left D-Day commemorations in Normandy, France, early and went on TV for an interview.

The move sparked backlash at home and appeared to be yet another setback for Sunak’s Conservative Party, which is down in opinion polls against Keir Starmer’s Labour Party. 

‘On reflection, it was a mistake not to stay longer, and I’ve apologized for that, but I also don’t think it’s right to be political in the midst of D-Day commemorations,’ Sunak told reporters. ‘The focus should rightly be on the veterans.’

Starmer remained in Normandy for the duration of events that commemorated the 80th anniversary of the D-Day invasion, which Britain’s King Charles and President Biden attended. The Labour leader was seen talking to several world leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Sunak spoke at a British-led event but delegated other duties to ministers, including Foreign Secretary David Cameron, who was pictured with Biden, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

His decision to leave the event early was reportedly made weeks in advance, before the general election was called, according to the BBC. But his campaign failed to consider the optics of the U.K. leader ditching D-Day commemorations to go on TV and criticize the opposition.

A Conservative politician who asked not to be identified told Reuters, ‘I can’t explain it and I won’t.’ 

The lawmaker said it could become the ‘Gillian Duffy moment’ — a reference to 2010 when Gordon Brown, who was then prime minister, apologized for being caught on tape calling a voter ‘a bigoted woman’, a moment seen as a turning point in a campaign he lost.

Others pounced on Sunak in the British press. ‘He should have stayed. As the PM of our country he should have been there to represent the country and to show our gratitude to those who fell,’ said former British army commander in Afghanistan Richard Kemp in comments to the Mirror, a tabloid newspaper. 

Labour spokesman Jonathan Ashworth said the ‘disrespect’ Sunak showed was ‘shocking.’ 

‘I think it reveals something unbecoming about both his judgment and his character, And I think people today will be asking, what type of person thinks it’s more important to rush away from an event like this, to go and do an interview to try and score political points to save his own skin than truly honor the fallen,’ Ashworth told Sky News. 

Nigel Farage, a lead campaigner for Brexit and leader of the Reform UK party, who will stand in the election, said Sunak’s actions were ‘an insult’ to America. 

‘He doesn’t really care about our history. He doesn’t really care, frankly, about our culture. He cares about staying in Number 10,’ Farage said in a video posted on social media. 

‘This man is not patriotic. Doesn’t believe in the country, its people, its history, or frankly, even its culture. If you’re a patriotic voter, don’t vote for Rishi Sunak,’ Farage said, adding that he was in Normandy ‘in a personal capacity because I wanted to be there. I care.’ 

The Conservative party is polling about 20 points behind Labour in opinion polls. 

Earlier this month, the Conservatives suffered historic losses in local elections, losing about half. Labour picked up seats and won most of the key mayoral races up for grabs, including in London.

The center-left party showed strength in areas that voted for Brexit in 2016 and in places where former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson prevailed over Labour in the 2019 general election.

In the interview with ITV on Thursday, Sunak warned Labour would raise taxes if elected by about 2,000 pounds, or $2,500, per household if they win the election. Labour leaders have denied the accusation and  

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A group of House lawmakers parachuted from a World War II-era plane on Friday to commemorate the 80th anniversary of D-Day.

A tradition first started by Reps. Mike Waltz, R-Fla., and Jason Crow, D-Colo., the event included 10 lawmakers this year – nine Republicans and one Democrat, all of whom served in the U.S. military. 

Fox News Digital obtained video of the lawmakers landing in Mont Saint-Michel, a commune in Normandy, France, as well as footage from Waltz’s Go Pro video during the jump.

They donned World War II military uniforms and parachuted into Normandy from a U.S. C-47 military transport plane that was extensively used during the war.

Rep. Cory Mills, R-Fla., said in a video after the jump that he was doing it in honor of Peter Arthur Durante, a World War II veteran with the 119th Battalion who is living in his district and just turned 100 earlier this month.

He told Fox News Digital earlier this week before jetting off to France, ‘The fact that we’re in Normandy, and you’re wearing that uniform … and you’re jumping from that plane that isn’t what we’re used to from our [service], you’re stepping back in time in a way, and you’re really trying to think about how many sacrifices that were made.’

‘This is one of the greatest opportunities that I’ve had since I’ve been in Congress: to be able to literally recreate and reenact what they had done in 1944,’ he said. ‘And so, [what is] really going to be one of those things I think about is how many we lost and then also how lucky we truly are as Americans,’ he said.

Asked what he’d be thinking about as he jumps out of the plane, Mills joked, ‘This is either going to be a great jump or we might not be the majority any longer.’

He also noted that it’s likely one of the last D-Day anniversaries that will actually have the aging veterans of that war in attendance.

Mills and his colleagues are part of a wider group of lawmakers who will be in Normandy along with President Biden to mark the anniversary of what’s widely considered to be the turning point of the war in Europe, when Allied forces went on to defeat the Axis powers led by Germany and its leader, Adolf Hitler. They are not, however, part of the formal congressional delegation sent by Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.

Crow, a former Army Ranger, said he, like Mills, served in the 82nd Airborne Division; both of Crow’s units played critical roles in the June 6, 1944, operation.

‘To be able to honor the veterans who served in those units before me, actually conducting the jump, is certainly a real privilege,’ he said.

The Colorado Democrat said he and Waltz first came up with the idea on the House floor: ‘I thought that it would be a good way, both as former paratroopers, to actually participate and honor our veterans.’

Another participant, Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, age 57, quipped to Fox News Digital, ‘It’s probably not the smartest thing to do at my age. But you know what? I’m going to do it.’

‘It’s just awesome. I mean, it’s going to be one of the last D-Day anniversaries where you actually have, you know, veterans that were there,’ Jackson said.

Other lawmakers who participated were Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., Rich McCormick, R-Ga., Keith Self, R-Texas, and House Homeland Security Chair Mark Green, R-Tenn.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Biden on Friday repeatedly referenced an ‘instinct’ to ‘walk away’ from democracy during a speech in Normandy about the heroics of the Army Rangers who scaled Pointe du Hoc more than 80 years ago on D-Day. 

‘We talk about democracy, American democracy. We often talk about the ideals of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. What we don’t talk about is how hard it is, how many ways we’re asked to walk away, how many instincts there are to walk away,’ Biden said. ‘The most natural instinct is to walk away.’ 

Biden, who at 81 is running for re-election this fall, has previously faced pressure from some in politics to step aside and let another Democrat pursue the nomination. 

He also used his speech Friday to take a swipe at Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

‘Because of them, the war turned,’ Biden said about the Army Rangers who climbed the cliffs of Pointe du Hoc. ‘They stood against Hitler’s aggression. Does anyone doubt that they would want America to stand up against Putin’s aggression here in Europe today?’ 

‘They stormed the beaches alongside their allies. Does anyone believe these Rangers would want America to go it alone today?’ he continued.  

‘They fought to vanquish a hateful ideology in the 30s and 40s. Does anyone doubt they wouldn’t move heaven and earth to vanquish hateful ideologies of today?’ Biden also said. ‘These Rangers put mission and country above themselves. Does anyone believe they would exact any less from every American today? 

Biden concluded his speech by saying ‘They’re not asking us to scale these cliffs, but they’re asking us to stay true to what America stands for… they’re asking us to do our job to protect freedom of our time, to defend democracy, to stand up to aggression abroad and at home, to be part of something bigger than ourselves. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Generated by Feedzy