An exiled Iranian resistance group has uncovered damning evidence showing top regime officials’ direct involvement in supporting the Houthis in their attacks against ships in the Red Sea.

Fox News Digital reviewed evidence provided by The People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) that claims to show how the Iranian-backed terror proxy based in northern Yemen is supplied by Tehran. The Houthis have conducted more than 50 attacks targeting ships traversing the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden since Oct. 7.

The MEK noted several methods and locations that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) uses to ship a variety of weaponry, including drones, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, anti-ship mines, radar equipment and communication systems, to the Houthis. They noted that some of the missiles in the Houthis’ possession are manufactured by the Aerospace Industries Organization, which has been sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department.

Adding fuel to the group’s claims, a February 2024 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report demonstrates Iranian support to Houthi proxies through side-by-side comparisons of Houthi and Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles and missile systems. Among the ballistic missiles in both countries’ arsenals is the Iranian Shahab-3, which the Houthis call the ‘Toofan.’ 

Also included in the Houthis’ weapons inventory are Iranian missiles that have been used to target Israel. The DIA report also shows the remains of what they believe was a Paveh land-attack cruise missile, designated the ‘Quds-4’ by the Houthis. The DIA says the device was ‘fired by the Houthis toward Israel in late October 2023.’ 

Following Hamas’ Oct. 7 terror attacks, the Houthis’ first attempted to target Israel directly on Oct. 19, according to the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. On March 18, reports noted that the Israel Defense Forces confirmed a Houthi cruise missile had infiltrated Israel, landing near Eilat. 

The Israel Defense Forces did not respond to a request for comment about how many times the Houthis have attempted to attack Israel since Oct. 7, or whether they have used Iranian weaponry to do so.

Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital that despite being ‘the newest member of the ‘Axis of Resistance,’’ the Houthis ‘actually have to date the most advanced long-range capabilities’ of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s proxy groups. ‘Putting capabilities like medium-range ballistic missiles or anti-ship ballistic missiles in the hands of an actor like the Houthis tells you something about the future operations that Iran envisions for this force,’ Taleblu added. 

The Houthis’ recent escalations have caused the U.S. Treasury Department to once more list the entity as a Specially Designated Terror Group in February 2024. This designation had been revoked in February 2021.

In its report to Fox News Digital, the MEK provided broad descriptions of the methods the IRGC-QF uses to deliver military material to Yemen. The MEK said the IRGC has ‘exerted pressure on some local barge owners’ to ferry weapons to Houthi boats ’10 miles off the coast of Yemen.’ On other occasions, the MEK reports that Iran may ship materials to Yemen after making ‘stopovers in African countries.’

The report states that Iran sometimes hides weaponry inside fenders, the ‘large shock absorbers that prevent ships from colliding with piers and other obstacles.’ On some occasions, the MEK reported that fenders were anchored below the water surface at a predetermined location, ‘and picked up by a secondary ship using built-in GPS.’ 

Other times, the fenders were attached to Iranian barges. On Aug. 13, 2019, the MEK said fenders ‘up to six meters long were attached to a ship at Bushehr wharf two days before departure’ to Lavan Island in the Persian Gulf. ‘Military weapons and equipment were concealed inside these fenders,’ the MEK said, but the group had no information about the cargo’s final destination.

On May 27, 2020, the MEK said Yemenis crewed a barge ‘loaded with light weapons’ from a location two miles from the port city of Jask. They also noted that the Bahman Piers, a set of ‘about 80 or 90’ secretive ports constructed along the Persian Gulf and the coast of the Sea of Oman on the 1982 orders of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, remain ‘outside the monitoring of international organizations.’ The MEK say the Bahman Piers are utilized as a means to smuggle oil and petrochemicals and ship out weapons to proxies, including the Houthis.

In addition to providing weapons to the Houthis, the MEK explained that Iran trains the Houthis to utilize high-tech weaponry, and has ‘helped the Houthis to develop from a ragtag force into a conventional military force’ by training Houthi military personnel. 

In a February interview with CBS, CENTCOM’s deputy commander, Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, confirmed that IRGC personnel are ‘serving side by side’ with the Houthis inside Yemen, ‘advising them and providing target information.’

In addition to training, Taleblu also sees signs that Yemen ‘has been a testing ground for Iranian weapons.’ Taleblu cited one case in which the Houthis showcased a medium-range ballistic missile with a unitary conical warhead in Yemen months before the Iranians ‘brought it into their arsenal.’

The difficulty of hindering support to the Houthis is underscored by the echelons of Iranian leadership involved in maintaining Iranian-Houthi relations. According to the MEK, the senior IRGC-QF commander, Brig. Gen. Abdul Reza Shahlai, also known as ‘Haj Yusuf,’ is charged with overseeing coordination with the Houthis. He is assisted by Brig. Gen. Ismail Qaani, Brig. Gen. Mohammad Reza Fallahzadeh, also known as ‘Abu Baqer,’ and Abu Fatemeh. 

The MEK also states that a headquarters within the Iranian Foreign Ministry ‘reviews and analyzes the effects of Houthi attacks,’ while IRGC Maj. Gen. Gholam Ali Rashid, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya command headquarters, is ‘primarily responsible for military affairs in Yemen.’ The MEK also alleges that Iran’s National Security Council sets the guidelines for Yemeni intervention and escalation, and that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is ultimately in charge of finalizing and approving decisions regarding political and military affairs in Yemen.

Khamenei, Shahlai, Qaani, Fallahzadeh and Rashid have been sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. The Department of Justice has offered a $15 million reward for information about Shahlai for his role in plotting the assassination of the Saudi ambassador in Washington, D.C., and his role in planning an attack in Iraq in which five U.S. soldiers were killed and three wounded.

The U.S. Treasury Department’s sanctions against Iran have grown in passing years in recognition of Iran’s role in funding terror in the Middle East. In April, Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen explained that the department had ‘targeted over 600 individuals and entities connected to Iran’s terrorist activity, its human rights abuses, and its financing of Hamas, the Houthis, Hizballah, and Iraqi militia groups.’ 

No matter how necessary, thwarting Iranian fundraising will prove a difficult endeavor. According to Taleblu, the Islamic Republic of Iran has a well-established system capable of ‘scaling up material support over time.’ Through a combination of direct financial transfers, money laundering schemes, illicit revenue, and a nontraditional system of sending remittances that uses front companies and exchange houses across multiple countries, ‘Iran has the ability to fund terrorism and engage in illicit financial trade across the region while under sanctions.’ 

Ali Safavi, of the Paris-based NCRI’s Foreign Affairs Committee, urged the international community to ‘hold the IRGC-QF accountable for leveraging the Houthis to destabilize the region.’ Safavi told Fox News Digital that designating the IRGC as a terrorist entity, as the U.S. did in 2019, would ‘not only significantly impede the IRGC’s ability to use front companies to evade sanctions and fund its malign activities and proxies but also seriously hinder the operations of its agents in the West.’ Most importantly, Safavi said ‘it would convey a powerful message to the Iranian people: the main force responsible for suppressing their uprisings is recognized globally as a terrorist entity, thereby legitimizing their resistance against it.’

Iran’s relationship with the Houthis is key in its strategy to cause harm to Israel, Taleblu says. The proxy has ‘created another vector of pressure against Israel, forcing Israel to have to expand more of its layered air and missile defense assets to protect its country.’ Ultimately, the ensuing financial and military pressure ‘would also reduce the political space for Israel to be able to accomplish freely, cheaply, or easily the military goal and the destruction of Hamas.’ Taleblu also said this would ultimately ‘create the political conditions for distance to grow between America and Israel.’

Iran can see that ‘the strategy is working,’ Taleblu says, and the world is ‘likely going to see more weapons proliferation across the region, not less.’ 

THE Associated Press contributed to this report.

The State Department is again warning Americans not to travel to Venezuela due to high levels of crime and civil unrest under the socialist dictatorship of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. 

The department has re-issued a ‘Level 4: Do Not Travel’ travel advisory, its most serious warning.

‘Do not travel to Venezuela due to crime, civil unrest, kidnapping, and the arbitrary enforcement of local laws,’ the notice on the State Department’s website reads. ‘Reconsider travel due to wrongful detentions, terrorism, and poor health infrastructure.’

‘Violent crimes, such as homicide, armed robbery, kidnapping, and carjacking, are common in Venezuela,’ the notice reads.

The State Department says there is a ‘high risk of wrongful detention of U.S. nationals in Venezuela’ and that security forces have detained U.S. citizens for up to five years, with the country not generally notifying the U.S. about detentions or granting access to citizen prisoners there.

Political rallies and demonstrations occur, often with little notice, the advisory states.

‘Anti-Maduro demonstrations have elicited a strong police and security force response, including the use of tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets against participants, and occasionally devolve into looting and vandalism. Shortages of gasoline, electricity, water, medicine, and medical supplies continue throughout much of Venezuela.’

Maduro is vying for re-election against Edmundo Gonzalez, a veteran ex-diplomat who was named the main opposition candidate after primary winner Maria Corina Machado had a ban on holding office upheld by the Supreme Court, a move condemned by the U.S. at the time. Machado has since given Gonzalez her backing.

The U.S. reimposed oil sanctions on OPEC-member Venezuela last month, accusing Maduro of not fully complying with deals reached with the opposition to ensure free and fair elections. With a recent poll showing any candidate backed by Machado having more than double Maduro’s support, opposition members have warned the ruling Socialist party could take action to bar Gonzalez from appearing on the ballot.

Maduro’s 2018 re-election was rejected by Western governments.

In March 2019, the State Department withdrew all diplomatic personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Caracas and suspended all consular services as well as routine and emergency services.

‘The U.S. government has no ability to provide emergency services to U.S. citizens in Venezuela. U.S. citizens in Venezuela who require consular assistance should try to leave the country as soon as safely possible to do so and should contact a U.S. embassy or consulate in another country.’

Meanwhile, the State Department also says that Colombian terrorist groups operate in Venezuela’s border areas with Colombia, Brazil and Guyana.

The notice comes at a time when Venezuelans are fleeing the country in droves and heading to the U.S.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform issued a report in January highlighting how the number of Venezuelans coming to the border has skyrocketed from 50,000 in FY 21 to nearly 335,000 in FY 23.

The report also expresses concern about the potential for gang members from Venezuela to enter the U.S., as well as concerns about terrorism, given Venezuela’s close ties with Iran, which in turn sponsors Hezbollah and Hamas. It notes past congressional hearings that have highlighted how Venezuela has provided militants with travel documents.

Reuters contributed to this report.

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) at the Justice Department is coming under fire after reports that some of its personnel have an apparent political bias against the targets of their investigations. 

The OIG says its mission is to ‘detect and deter fraud, waste, abuse, and misconduct by conducting objective, independent, and impactful oversight of the Department, its programs, and the conduct of its personnel.’ 

OIG personnel are non-political employees and do not shift with changes to the executive branch. Inspector General Michael Horowitz was confirmed by the Senate in 2012.

However, recent reporting and documents reviewed by Fox News Digital reveal that some OIG personnel, including ones responsible for overseeing investigations into Trump administration political appointees, appear to have partisan bias.

America First Legal (AFL) on Wednesday sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the DOJ to investigate the ‘existence of politically motivated employees in positions that demand impartiality.’ 

‘The Department’s Office of Inspector General itself describes that ‘[i]n light of today’s wide-spread lack of trust and negative views of government, a key facet of the Department’s challenge of strengthening public trust is ensuring that DOJ personnel fulfill their duties without any actual or perceived political influence or partisan consideration,’’ the FOIA request states. 

‘Despite this unambiguous obligation to avoid the appearance of political or partisan considerations, there is evidence that the Office of the Inspector General is deeply infected with partisan actors,’ it says.

According to documents reviewed by Fox News Digital, one OIG attorney, Deborah Falk Zerwitz, has donated 35 times to Democrats or Democrat-linked entities since 2007, totaling $6,466.

Zerwitz is currently overseeing OIG’s investigation into the department’s 2020 probe into deaths in state-run nursing homes in New York, New Jersey, Michigan and Pennsylvania. 

On her X account, Zerwitz ‘liked’ dozens of political posts including disparaging posts about then-Attorney General Bill Barr and Trump appointees, including one post saying all White House lawyers drafting executive orders should be ‘disbarred,’ and one accusing Barr of promoting a ‘myth of unaccountable career prosecutor.’ 

Another post she appeared to have ‘liked’ said, ‘We need to send Donald Trump packing, but we can’t stop there. We need to boot his Republican enablers out of office — at every level of government.’

She also ‘liked’ posts that referenced ‘Trump and his racist homophobic cult members,’ and one that read ‘Attention QANON, MAGAT Fascists,’ and ended with, ‘SO F— OFF.’  She also liked a post that accused Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., of ‘eroding our democracy.’

Jennifer Ramella, another OIG lawyer investigating DOJ’s nursing home death probe, donated 33 times between 2020 and 2022 to the Democratic PAC ActBlue, totaling over $300.

Another is Christina Monta, a former OIG counsel who led the investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania’s probe into reports of potential issues with a few mail-in ballots at the Luzerne County Board of Elections in 2020.

Monta, according to FEC data, made several contributions to ActBlue and Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s Senate campaign, totaling $1,014.50 between 2019 and 2020.

Monta was counsel in one of the first cases DOJ litigated to allow biological males into women’s bathrooms in 2015. She also joined the DOJ’s challenge of Texas’ voter ID law around the same time.

‘It is imperative that Americans learn whether these views persist within the Department of Justice, certainly meeting the Department’s standard that a ‘matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which there exist possible questions about the government’s integrity that affect public confidence,’ especially as we approach a Presidential election,’ AFL’s FOIA request states. 

‘It is vital for our democracy and trust in government that those in government with duties to be impartial do not wield their power by targeting political opponents,’ they said. 

A spokesperson for the OIG told Fox News Digital, ‘Consistent with the First Amendment, Citizens United, and federal law, the OIG respects the constitutional rights of its employees, and of all citizens.’

‘The OIG’s work is fact-based and objective, as evidenced by our reports on FISA abuses, Operation Fast and Furious, and decades of other oversight. Our ongoing work meets the same standards,’ the spokesperson said. 

In 2019, the OIG released a report on FISA abuses in the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation and outlined their investigation process: 

‘As part of the standard practice in our reviews, we provided a draft copy of this report to the Department and the FBI to conduct a factual accuracy review. Also consistent with our standard practice, we contacted individuals who were interviewed as part of the review and whose conduct is addressed in this report, and certain other witnesses, to provide them an opportunity to review the portions of the report that pertain to their testimony to the OIG. With limited exceptions, these witnesses availed themselves of this opportunity, and we provided those who did conduct such a review with the opportunity to provide oral or written comments directly to the OIG concerning the portions they reviewed, consistent with rules to protect classified information.’

The Civil Service Reform Act also prohibits OIG from discriminating against employees based on their political affiliations. 

Gene Hamilton, AFL executive director, said in a statement that, ‘if the ‘watchdog’ is a mere partisan bulldog, it does not deserve to exist.’