Tag

slider

Browsing

The presidential debate on Tuesday between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Trump saw a number of testy moments between the two candidates.

The debate, which was in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was the first and possibly only debate between Harris and Trump. The Harris campaign quickly said ‘Harris is ready for a second debate,’ but Trump said on Wednesday morning during a ‘Fox and Friends’ interview that he ‘won the debate’ and is ‘less inclined to’ do another debate with Harris.

Here are some of the top clashes of the night:

Abortion fight

One of the early clashes between the two was over abortion. Harris accused Trump of opening the door to ‘Trump abortion bans’ due to his nomination of justices who eventually overturned Roe v Wade.

‘If Donald Trump were to be re-elected, he will sign a national abortion ban,’ she said.

Trump responded by calling that a ‘lie.’ The two would eventually challenge each other on the topic, with Trump asking if Harris would support late-term abortions, and Harris challenging Trump to say if he would veto a federal abortion ban.

‘Will she allow abortion in the eighth month? Ninth month? Seventh month?’ Trump asked.

‘Come on,’ Harris said.

‘OK, would you do that?’ he responded.

‘Why don’t you ask her that question?’ Trump appealed to the moderators.

‘Why don’t you answer the question, would you veto?’ Harris asked Trump.

Are Trump’s rallies boring?

Harris upset former Trump when she accused him of holding boring rallies and accused him of talking about ‘windmills causing cancer.’

‘What you will also notice is that people start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom. And I will tell you, the one thing you will not hear him talk about is you.’

Trump soon shot back: ‘People don’t go to her rallies. There’s no reason to go. And the people that do go, she’s busing them in and paying them to be there. And then showing them in a different light. So she can’t talk about that. People don’t leave my rallies. We have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics.’

‘I’m talking now’

Trump used a quip on Tuesday evening similar to one made famous in 2020 by Harris during the vice presidential debate, in which she repeatedly told then-Vice President Mike Pence, ‘I’m speaking.’

‘Wait a minute, I’m talking now if you don’t mind. Please,’ Trump said. ‘Does that sound familiar?’

Harris smiled as she clearly got the reference. 

‘I am not Joe Biden’

‘Remember this, she is Biden. You know, she’s trying to get away from Biden. ‘I don’t know the gentleman,’ she says. She is Biden. The worst inflation we’ve ever had. A horrible economy because inflation has made it so bad and she can’t get away with it,’ he said.

Harris shot back: ‘Clearly, I am not Joe Biden and I am certainly not Donald Trump. And what I do offer is a new generation of leadership for our country.’

Spar over Russia

Harris and Trump attacked one another over Russian President Vladimir Putin.

‘It is well known that he admires dictators, wants to be a dictator on day one, according to himself. It is well known that he said of Putin that he can do whatever the hell he wants and go into Ukraine. It is well known that he said when Russia went into the Ukraine, it was brilliant,’ she said.

Trump pushed back, accusing Harris of being ‘weak on national security’ and said she had the endorsement of Putin.

‘Putin endorsed her last week, said, ‘I hope she wins,’ and I think he meant it because what he’s gotten away with is absolutely incredible. It wouldn’t have happened with me,’ he said.

Fox News’ Matteo Cina contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It was not only Americans tuning into the U.S. presidential debate Tuesday night as former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris faced off for the first time.

The results of the November election are expected to have resounding consequences for U.S. policy abroad, and the international community has been paying close attention following President Biden’s drop from the race this July.

The reactions by the international press to the Tuesday night debate drew stark comparisons from Trump’s first debate, which largely focused on heightened concerns surrounding Biden’s cognitive abilities.

This time, though, Trump’s performance was in their crosshairs. 

United Kingdom

The U.K. press, notoriously divided along party lines, reflected critical evaluations of how Trump performed under pressure from former prosecutor Harris, who was determined to have successfully achieved what so many of Trump’s opponents have been unable to – she flustered him.

Three of the right-leaning Telegraph’s leading stories on the debate suggested Harris came out on top, with one headline reading ‘Harris puts Trump on defensive in fiery showdown,’ while another report described Trump’s performance as ‘furious’ and ‘rambled.’

In analyzing the champion of the debate, the report concluded that Harris ‘made [Trump] look ridiculous.’

‘It is difficult to crown Harris the victor of a political debate in which she said so little about her own platform. But her attack strategy won her the night. Trump fell for it: hook line and sinker,’ the report added. 

The Times of London, generally considered a conservative-leaning newspaper, reported that Trump ‘struggled’ through the debate, while another report criticized that he ‘leaned’ into his base rather than going after moderate voters after they claimed he brought up a debunked claim that migrants in Springfield, Ohio, were ‘eating the pets’ of residents.

A third report on the Times’ homepage read, ‘Strong night for Harris gets better with Taylor Swift endorsement.’

The Sun had more divided takeaways of the night with one report claiming Trump ‘ripped into Harris’ while another highlighted a politics expert who called Trump’s debate talking points ‘Nonsense’ and also highlighted his ‘meltdown over ‘migrants eating pets’.’

France

The French press gave the win to Harris, with Le Monde, the nation’s top publication, leading with a headline that read ‘Harris, on offense, wins debate against Trump.’

L’Express, a Paris-based magazine described as center-right, also argued Trump was on the defensive Tuesday night in its report titled, ‘‘Kamala Harris has started to bang on Trump’ – the debate seen by the foreign press.’

Germany

The leading story on the publicly funded news outlet Deutsche Welle was headed by, ‘Harris puts Trump on defensive in fiery debate’ and claimed pollsters showed Harris ‘narrowly won’ over Trump. 

Though the report also noted the debate is unlikely to have an impact on U.S. voters – a sentiment broadly expressed in reporting across the U.S. as well.

Russia

Russian state-owned media TASS did not have any mention of the U.S. debate on its homepage.

While state-run news agency RIA Novosti lightly covered the debate, with one report headlined ‘Trump is doomed.’

A second report pointed to a response issued by the German Foreign Office following comments made by Trump during his closing remarks that criticized Berlin’s push toward clean energy.

The report included a response by the ministry posted to X, which said, ‘Like it or not: Germany’s energy system is fully operational, with more than 50% renewables. And we are shutting down – not building – coal & nuclear plants. Coal will be off the grid by 2038 at the latest. 

‘PS: We also don’t eat cats and dogs,’ the ministry added in an apparent jab at Trump’s previous debate comments. 

Ukraine

In Ukraine – where the results of the 2024 election are expected to have a significant impact given Trump’s previous comments suggesting he will not continue to militarily support Kyiv – reports focused on the combative exchange between Trump and Harris. 

The Kyiv Independent honed in on Trump’s claims that he will have the war ‘settled’ before even taking up the top job if elected this November – though he has refused to detail how he will accomplish this. 

The report did not name a winner or a loser, though it pointed out the two engaged in a bitter clash over the issue of Russia’s invasion and highlighted Trump’s refusal to say whether he wants Ukraine to come out on top.

Israel 

Israeli publications appeared to have more heavily covered the debate, though both candidates spent little time discussing the war between Israel and Hamas, and Harris was largely deemed the frontrunner.

One report by Israel Hayom, a right-leaning outlet, said Harris was ‘exuding confidence and control’ and accused Trump of appearing ‘self-absorbed rather than voter-focused.’

The report said there was no clear ‘knockout’ winner, but added the debate ‘was a genuine rhetorical slugfest in which Harris successfully exploited Trump’s weak spots and knocked him off balance.’

The Jerusalem Post, also deemed to have conservative tendencies in its reporting, described the debate as ‘predictable’ but noted Trump’s ‘apocalyptic prediction’ that Israel would cease to exist under a Harris presidency was a ‘reach’ and ‘oddly depriv[ed] the Jewish state of any agency or capacity to survive.’

Mexico

Mexico-based news outlet El Universal did not pronounce a clear winner as it did with the previous presidential debate when it named Trump debate champion over Biden.  

Though in a report detailing opinions by the publication’s top political commentators, Harris appeared to come out on top, with one opinion writer noting ‘Kamala Harris came well prepared and demolished former President Donald Trump for 90 minutes.’

Another argued the debate was the ultimate test for Harris following Biden’s ‘terrible’ debate performance in July.

‘Will it be enough to consolidate [her] lead in key states? We have to wait, but this debate was essential,’ Andrew Seele told the publication. Harris passed the test, and with flying colors.’

China

Chinese state-run media reported very little on the debate despite Trump-era tariffs being a top isused discussed during the night’s event. 

When Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning waspressed by media outlets during the morning briefing Wednesday, she said she had ‘no comment.’

Though she did add that Beijing is ‘opposed to making China an issue in U.S. elections.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Three years since the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and 23 years since the 9/11 terror attacks that led to the U.S. invasion, Afghanistan finds itself in a worse position now than it was on that fateful day.

‘This country has become once again a safe haven for terrorism. It will become a battlefield once again,’ Afghan National Resistance Front (NRF) leader Ahmad Massoud told Fox News Digital in a rare interview.

According to Massoud, the threat emanating from Afghanistan is much greater today than it was on 9/11, and the U.S. failed to achieve its number one objective of rooting out terrorists when it hastily pulled out of Afghanistan in August 2021.

The threat of terrorism from Afghanistan has spread from the U.S. to Europe and recently to Russia. It is just a matter of time, Massoud fears, for it to reach America’s shores again.

‘I know for a fact the time will come,’ Massoud said.

Massoud is not giving up on his vision of a free and democratic Afghanistan despite the odds, and he believes that Americans and Afghans hold intimate bonds over shared values of fighting for freedom against terrorists.

‘I feel very much the same feeling with all those victims of 9/11 and the people of the United States and Afghanistan are very much connected to each other because those attacks were carried out by the same team, those who attacked Americans on 9/11 killed my father,’ Massoud said.

Twenty-three years later and four U.S. presidential administrations since, Afghans live under the same threat of Islamic extremism and with the same pain and oppression as they did on 9/11.

Almost immediately after the Taliban regained power, anti-Taliban forces quickly fled to Afghanistan’s northern Panjshir Valley and announced their opposition to the new regime. 

Massoud, the leader of the NRF, vowed to continue the fight against the Taliban.

‘I didn’t want to leave my people alone in the hands of evil,’ Massoud told Fox News Digital.

Massoud is the son of Afghan resistance hero Ahmad Shah Massoud. The younger Massoud was only 12 years old when his father was assassinated by al Qaeda two days before the 9/11 terror attacks. Shah Massoud was integral to the rebels who fought against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s and became a leading figure in the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance that resisted the Taliban’s reign from 1996 to 2001.

As a young boy growing up in war-ravaged Afghanistan, it was not clear at the time that he would follow in the same footsteps as his legendary rebel father.

‘My father never wanted me to walk in the same path,’ Massoud recounted.

His father did not want him becoming a rebel leader because of the pain that it causes, Massoud remembered, and the enormous pressure and the high expectations it has is unbearable.

Massoud is not doing this for his late father or because he is his son.

‘I’m just doing it because I’m madly in love with my people, and I cannot see them in this situation.’

As the years and memories of that sunny, cloudless and traumatic Tuesday morning in September fade away, Massoud is trying to remind America and the world not to forget about the threat from terrorism in Afghanistan.

‘Today, al Qaeda is much stronger and entrenched in Afghanistan than it has ever been,’ the resistance leader said.

The 2020 Doha Agreement negotiated under former President Donald Trump laid the groundwork for the withdrawal of all U.S. forces in exchange for a pledge from the Taliban to prevent any terrorist organization from using Afghan soil to threaten or attack the United States or its allies.

Taliban spokespersons made assurances that they would not allow any terror group to plan an attack from Afghan territory. Although it is true that al Qaeda and other terrorist groups have yet to stage any attacks on the U.S. or its allies, groups like al Qaeda still operate within Afghanistan and have deeply rooted ties with the Taliban.

Numerous United Nations reports note that since their return to power, relations with al Qaeda remain close, and the group that carried out the 9/11 terror attacks is ‘strategically patient, cooperating with other terrorist groups in Afghanistan and prioritizing its ongoing relationship with the Taliban.’

Al Qaeda operates at least eight training camps across Afghanistan but does so covertly in order to create the image that the Taliban is adhering to the Doha Agreement, according to U.N. monitoring.

While the U.S. was negotiating with the Taliban, Massoud knew all along they were not negotiating in good faith.

‘It is going to fail, and it will also show the world the true face of the Taliban,’ Massoud said.

The leader of the NRF said the international community believed the lies of the Taliban that they had fundamentally changed from the group that previously ruled Afghanistan prior to 9/11. 

‘Women have been degraded to nothing but property of men and education has been completely destroyed by the Taliban,’ Massoud said angrily. 

The elder Massoud, according to his son, warned against an international presence in Afghanistan, saying that the U.S. came to him and proposed operating military bases in the country and to help jointly fight against terrorism.

Shah Massoud was very clear in his vision.

‘My father said boots on the ground in Afghanistan will never work,’ Massoud recounts his father saying. ‘We fought against the invasion of the Russians. And really, he did not want the presence of another foreign force in Afghanistan,’ he added.

The U.S. did not heed these warnings when they went into Afghanistan.

Massoud wants to continue his father’s policy of no foreign troops on Afghan soil and wants to fight terrorism with his own forces based in the country. What he is looking for is the logistical and financial support to carry on the fight.

‘We indeed need help and support from the world,’ Massoud said, but he also understands the frustration in the United States over ‘forever wars’ and respects U.S. policy opposing further wars. The U.S.-Afghan relationship should continue its efforts to fight terrorism, Massoud believes, and that Afghans should not feel betrayed while the same group that killed Americans and Afghans is in power.

Three years later, and with the Taliban cementing their power, the U.S.-Afghan partnership that emerged after 9/11 remains nonexistent.

‘We are on our own and there is no external support.’

Massoud believes if the U.S. and international community throw their support behind the NRF, it could make a huge difference.

‘Even the slightest of external support, you would see the liberation of a big chunk of Afghanistan. Because the people are very much against the Taliban, the slightest bit of hope and the slightest of opportunities for the people of Afghanistan, and we would see a crack in the armor of the Taliban,’ he explained.

Massoud did not mince words when talking about U.S. policy and was critical of the period immediately after 9/11 and the invasion of Afghanistan when the War on Terror expanded to Iraq and Saddam Hussein’s regime.

‘The expansion of this war to Iraq completely diverted attention from Afghanistan and Afghanistan for a while [was] the second priority.’ Massoud argued that more attention was needed to help build Afghan institutions and make the new government more stable and therefore harder to overthrow.  

Massoud was also critical of early U.S. strategy, including the endeavor to create an Afghan army in the image of the U.S. armed forces.

‘We did not have American resources or American technology. It was a recipe for disaster.’

Massoud also said that the U.S.’ conflicting strategies of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency over the years failed to fully defeat the Taliban and create a stable Afghan government.

‘It means that, unfortunately, the Afghans could not make the Americans understand that these strategies don’t work in Afghanistan, and they failed to come up with a proper strategy.’

However critical Massoud is of American and international leadership and strategy in Afghanistan, he still placed 70% to 80% of the blame on the Afghan leadership and their flawed thinking that the U.S. and coalition partners would remain in Afghanistan forever like on the Korean Peninsula. The false sense of security did not allow Afghan leaders to focus on national trust, and corruption and criminality ran rampant.

‘Unfortunately, the inside political game and personal agendas and not having the capability to see that this situation could never last very long, or that it was not a forever perk,’ hurt Afghanistan’s ability to fight terrorism threats it faced or build a stable democracy.

‘They missed all of those opportunities,’ Massoud said.

The resistance leader is not unaware of the complicated nature of international politics and realizes that many conflicts are currently raging on, which require U.S. attention and resources.

‘There’s a fatigue in the U.S. and the West, and they have been stretched from Ukraine to Taiwan to Gaza. So that stress is also another factor for them not to actually pay attention to Afghanistan,’ Massoud lamented. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A focus group reacting live to the presidential debate appeared to have strong opinions about the controversial conservative plan, Project 2025.

Project 2025 was launched by the Heritage Foundation as part of their Presidential Transition Project for the 2024 cycle. The project has become a talking point for Democrats, who have attempted to smear it as radical and tie it to former President Donald Trump.

During the presidential debate on Tuesday, Democrats and independent support for Vice President Kamala Harris shot up as she railed against Project 2025. 

‘On this debate tonight, you’re gonna hear from the same old tied playbook. A bunch of lies, grievances, and name-calling. What you’re gonna hear tonight is a detailed and dangerous plan called Project 2025 that the former president intends on implementing if he were elected again,’ Harris said. ‘I believe very strongly that the American people want a president who understands the importance of bringing us together.’

Trump, however, denied any involvement with the group.

‘As you know, and as she knows better than anyone, I have nothing to do with Project 2025. That’s out there. I haven’t read it. I don’t want to read it purposely. I’m not going to read it,’ Trump said during Tuesday’s debate. 

As he spoke about the controversial group, he gained support among Republicans but saw a dramatic shift downward from both independents and Democrats. 

‘This was a group of people that got together. They came up with some ideas, I guess some good, some bad. But it makes no difference,’ he added. ‘Everybody knows I’m an open book. Everybody knows what I’m going to do.’

All three voting blocs, however, shot up in support for Trump when he said he was going to ‘cut taxes very substantially and create a great economy like I did before.’

Independents showed dissatisfaction with Trump while he talked about the coronavirus pandemic, but both Democrats and Republicans were consistently more supportive of the former president as he discussed the pandemic and the economy.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., was forced to delay a House-wide vote on his plan to avert a partial government shutdown on Wednesday after a slew of GOP defections put the bill on life support within days of its rollout.

Johnson told reporters there would be ‘no vote today’ on the measure, a short-term extension of this year’s government funding called a continuing resolution (CR), combined with a measure to mandate a proof of citizenship requirement in the voter registration process.

House leaders originally planned to hold the vote late on Wednesday afternoon, though as of earlier in the morning, at least eight Republican lawmakers signaled opposition.

Conservative opponents on Johnson’s right flank who were largely against CRs in general – believing them to be an extension of overbroad ‘omnibus’ spending bills which they oppose – accused House GOP leaders of trying to appease them with a messaging bill that would not ultimately be signed into law.

Some GOP national security hawks were also wary of the bill’s six-month spending extension over its impact on military and other defense funding, pushing instead for a shorter spending patch into December.

House and Senate leaders must reach an agreement on government funding by Sept. 30 to avert a partial government shutdown.

One source familiar with discussions told Fox News Digital that they anticipate Johnson holding the vote next week, something the speaker also alluded to in his comments.

The American people demand and deserve that we do everything possible to secure the elections. That’s what we’ve been saying consistently,’ Johnson said. ‘We’re going to continue to work on this. The whip is going to do the hard work and build consensus. We’re going to work through the weekend on that.’

In a shot at the bill’s opponents on both sides, Johnson said, ‘I want any member of Congress in either party to explain to the American people why we should not ensure that only U.S. citizens are voting in U.S. elections.’

Trump had advocated for the six-month CR attached to the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act last month, urging House Republicans to leverage a shutdown weeks before Election Day to get it passed.

He appeared to change his tune somewhat this week, urging GOP lawmakers to vote against a CR unless they were ensured of a noncitizen voting crackdown.

‘If Republicans in the House, and Senate, don’t get absolute assurances on Election Security, THEY SHOULD, IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, GO FORWARD WITH A CONTINUING RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET. THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO ‘STUFF’ VOTER REGISTRATIONS WITH ILLEGAL ALIENS. DON’T LET IT HAPPEN – CLOSE IT DOWN!!!’ Trump wrote on his Truth Social app.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., a Johnson critic and a top ally of Trump’s, told reporters of his post, ‘What he’s talking about is, it’s about Speaker Johnson. You see, all of us can go into battle voting for a CR plus the SAVE act, but none of it matters if the speaker of the House is unwilling to fight for it. And, so I think that Truth Social was pointed at one man, and that’s where the pressure is.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

North Korea is promising to refine its weapons development and strengthen its nuclear capabilities. 

Supreme leader Kim Jong Un made the comments Monday at a state event celebrating the country’s 76th anniversary.

‘The obvious conclusion is that the nuclear force of the DPRK and the posture capable of properly using it for ensuring the state’s right to security in any time should be more thoroughly perfected,’ the dictator said.

‘DPRK’ is an abbreviation for North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Kim Jong Un warned that the United States’ increased involvement in the region has forced the regime to pursue more powerful weapons as a deterrence mechanism.

‘The DPRK will steadily strengthen its nuclear force capable of fully coping with any threatening acts imposed by its nuclear-armed rival states and redouble its measures and efforts to make all the armed forces of the state, including the nuclear force, fully ready for combat,’ the supreme leader said.

North Korea has sought to both augment its self-defense capabilities and strengthen its regional alliances against the United States.

The 14th Supreme People’s Assembly, the unicameral legislative body of the country, amended the national constitution last year to enshrine nuclear weaponization as a core principle.

Kim Jong Un met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in June, affirming the two nations’ shared history and commitment to mutual defensive support.

Li Hongzhong, a high-ranking official within the Chinese Communist Party, traveled to North Korea in July for a similar goodwill visit.

The Russia-China-North Korea triad’s increasing cooperation against Western interests has made their alliance a significant consideration for U.S. and NATO officials.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former President Trump is not surprised by pop superstar Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

Trump claimed the singer was always going to endorse the Democratic Party during a call-in to ‘Fox & Friends’ on Wednesday morning.

‘It was just a question of time. She couldn’t […] possibly endorse Biden. You look at Biden, you couldn’t possibly endorse him,’ Trump said, clarifying that he is ‘not a Taylor Swift fan.’

‘But she’s a very liberal person. She seems to always endorse a Democrat. And she’ll probably pay a price for it […] in the marketplace.’

Swift endorsed Kamala Harris for president just minutes after the Democratic nominee’s presidential debate against her Republican opponent, Donald Trump. 

Writing on Instagram, the pop star said she will be voting for Harris because, ‘she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them.’

Trump quipped during his ‘Fox & Friends’ call-in that he ‘actually like[s] Mrs. Mahomes much better,’ referring to Brittany Mahomes, the wife of Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes.

‘She’s a big Trump fan,’ Trump said.

Mahomes first indicated her support for Trump on Aug. 13, when she liked Trump’s Instagram post that outlined the ‘2024 GOP platform.’ The swimsuit model then appeared to respond to criticism on her Instagram Stories.

‘I mean honestly, To be a hater as an adult, you have to have some deep-rooted issues you refuse to heal from childhood,’ she wrote on Instagram Stories after receiving criticism for her support. ‘There’s no reason your brain is fully developed and you hate to see others doing well.’

Swift was with Travis Kelce and the Mahomes family at Flushing Meadows to watch the U.S. Open. Swift and Brittany Mahomes were snapped embracing each other lovingly.

Fox News Digital’s Ryan Gaydos and Bradford Betz contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former President Donald Trump’s top allies are rushing to declare victory after his debate against Vice President Kamala Harris on Tuesday night.

GOP lawmakers are touting a Trump win even as they criticize ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis for their handling of the debate, accusing them of acting with bias against the ex-president.

‘President Trump delivered a powerful America First message directly to the American people focusing on reining in inflation and strengthening our economy, securing our border, and peace through strength foreign policy,’ House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., said in a statement at the tail end of the debate.

‘The ABC moderators were not journalists, they were pro-Kamala activists who baselessly attacked President Trump leading to a 3 on 1 debate, while allowing Kamala to lie repeatedly. President Trump won overwhelmingly and will win again on Election Day.’

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Trump ‘exposed’ Harris as a ‘radical’ despite her seeking to reflect more moderate positions on firearm ownership and the border at times.

‘While Harris lied about her radical positions and spoke about things she would supposedly do as president, and despite the biased moderators shamelessly covering for Harris, there are two problems that Americans were reminded of in prime-time: she has a lifelong record as a Marxist, and she’s the sitting Vice President who could secure the border and bring down costs today,’ Johnson said.

Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, similarly told Fox News host Sean Hannity, ‘The moderators didn’t do their job, but President Trump did do his job.’

Senate GOP Conference Chair John Barrasso, R-Wyo., wrote on X, ‘President Trump tonight shared his strong vision to reverse the high prices and open borders of the Biden-Harris administration. He articulated a plan to unleash American energy and to get our country back on track.’

Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, Trump’s former White House physician, said the ex-president ‘just DESTROYED Kamala Harris on national television and EXPOSED her administration for the harm it caused!!’

Meanwhile, Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., said on X at the end of the debate, ‘Joe Biden set the bar low enough to bunny hop over it and she still somehow managed to limbo underneath.’

However, not all Republicans agreed it was a clear victory for Trump. One GOP lawmaker, granted anonymity to speak freely, told Fox News Digital that Harris appeared to be getting under Trump’s skin.

‘She talks to us like toddlers but is doing a good job of provoking him,’ the GOP lawmaker said during the debate. ‘He’s right on policy but can’t keep to a message.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Voters taking part in a Fox News Digital panel reacting to the debate said that Vice President Kamala Harris came away from the event with a victory.

Asked who they thought won the debate, 12 voters on the panel raised their hand for Harris while just five indicated they believed former President Donald Trump won.

Asked why they thought Harris won, many voters expressed that Trump did not know how to attack his new opponent in the race.

‘He is still in his head basically trying to run against Joe Biden,’ one voter said.

Another voter knocked Trump for not bringing fresh ideas to the stage.

‘Trump was so bad, he’s just like an old suit from like 1987 right now. He just repeats himself, says the same stuff, and she’s refreshing in that she’s different,’ the voter said. ‘I think if he had a different line of attack with her, it would have been more effective.’

‘I think she won the debate from my perspective, because he was so bad and he just sounds so repetitive, but I think she’s weak. She’s weak on the substance and she’s weak on the facts,’ the voter added.

But the panel didn’t provide only good news for Harris, with few of those participating saying that the vice president met their expectations.

‘She wasn’t very specific when asked certain things,’ one voter said. ‘She knows how to pull at your heartstrings. She knows how to be dramatic in a way that will touch the heart of Americans while avoiding the hot button questions.’

The debate may be the only one between the two candidates before election day in November, coming after President Biden’s disastrous debate performance earlier this year that helped launch a movement to force him out of the election and just 56 days until most voters cast their ballots.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former President Trump brought up one of Vice President Kamala Harris’ most memorable debate lines Tuesday night when he told her to ‘wait a minute’ and said ‘I’m talking now’ during a debate exchange. 

‘She gave up at least 12 and probably 14 or 15 different policies, like she was big on defund the police,’ Trump said before it appeared VP Harris attempted to say something. 

‘Wait a minute, I’m talking now,’ Trump shot back. ‘If you don’t mind, please. Does that sound familiar?’

Trump was referencing a debate moment between VP candidates Harris and Mike Pence when she told Pence ‘I’m speaking’ during a 2020 vice presidential debate when he was attempting to talk over her. 

At the time, critics of Harris suggested the quote was an attempt to create a viral moment.

The Harris and Trump campaigns went back and forth in the weeks leading up to the debate about whether the microphones should be muted for the candidate not speaking during the debate. Ultimately, the decision was made to mute the mics.  

The moment was noticed by conservatives on social media, including commentator Dana Loesch who remarked on X, ‘Good quip.’

‘She went out in Minnesota and wanted to let criminals that killed people that burned down Minneapolis,’ Trump said immediately after asking Harris to let him finish speaking. ‘She went out and raised money to get them out of jail. She did things that nobody would ever think of. Now she wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison.’

Trump is maintaining his lead nationally, seemingly shrugging off a burst of enthusiasm for Democrats after Harris entered the race, according to recent polling.

Trump garnered the support of 48% of likely voters, compared to 47% who indicated support for Harris, according to the latest results of a New York Times/Siena poll released Sunday.

Fox News Digital’s Brian Flood and Michael Lee contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Generated by Feedzy